>count(*) && just counting the number of records anyway
Yes, this is true.
Thank you for the help
Agnes
>Good Agnes, better than mine
>
>
>you can change
>COUNT(c1 + c2 )
>
>into
>
>count(*)
>
>
>
>
>>Grgory,
>>
>>what do you think about
>>
>>DELETE FROM Schnaps;
>> WHERE i1 IN ;
>> (;
>> SELECT S.i1 ;
>> FROM Schnaps AS S;
>> INNER JOIN;
>> ( ;
>> SELECT c3, MIN(i1) AS i1;
>> FROM Schnaps ;
>> GROUP BY 1 ;
>> HAVING ( COUNT(c1 + c2 ) > 1) ;
>> ) AS AA ;
>> ON S.c3 == AA.c3;
>> AND S.i1>AA.i1;
>> )
>>
>>
>>?
>>
>>Agnes
Words are given to man to enable him to conceal his true feelings.
Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord
Weeks of programming can save you hours of planning.
OffThere is no place like [::1]
