If the governement reduce the tax, I predict that lots of employers will reduce considerably the annual raise and the salary of the employees for the years to come. They will figure that you can make a living with the net amount of money you received before the reduction of tax, so they will give you the same buying power after the reduction of tax by increasing their marge of profit. In the end, you will find yourself with the same amount of money in your pocket, it will be your employer that will profit from the tax reduction.

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. I am just curious if there is any evidence that you can site that supports your opinion.

The last time I worked as a wage slave, it was for a large corporation. Employee bonuses at the end of the fiscal year were based on a combination of how much profit the company made and the employee's review (i.e., how hard they worked). It is not profitable for any company to have high turnover and unhappy employees do not stay or work very hard. So I disagree with you (now there's a surprise <s>)

So, do you prefer giving the money to the governement so that you benefit from it by having more services or do you prefer to enrich your employer and have nothing more in return?

Neither. But, then again, I believe that your premise is faulty. There is a third choice. Allow the prople who work hard and earn good money keep more of it in their pockets.