>>>>>>>I will not be responding to any more of your insults. They say a lot more about your state of mind than mine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You really are a hypocrite. I suppose that this statement was not intended as an insult:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That you consider the NY Times just a liberal propoganda piece is an indication of how brainwashed you are by the right wing chattering class
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Don't dish it out if you can't take it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It wasn't an insult, just an observation. If I wanted to insult you I could come up with a lot better than that, based on your own words and actions.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think you are fooling anyone here. That's just an observation... :o)
>>>>
>>>>Fooling anyone how? I'm not trying to. On the point in this thread, if I have insulted Marcia she has insulted me 10 times as much. At least. She goes out of her way to do so.
>>>
>>>By couching your insults as you often do. While her insults are more direct and stated openly (and go too far at times I will agree), yours are couched, but they are almost always there. Your supposedly 'just an observation' above (bold emphasis mine) is the perfect example. That is clearly an insult. You cannot convince me it was not your intention. Not everyone here is that dense. You intentionaly word your statements to do that.
>>
>>You are implying that I am as nasty to her as she is to me, just in a different way. I take offense at that because I don't think there is any comparison at all.
>
>I agree with Tracy. Go back and read your posts with a critical eye to all of the little zingers in them, couched with asides that you want to convey a joke, or a smile or whatever. They are still jabs, barbs and attacks. Its just that you can't be direct about it.

Maybe they are subliminal because I am not aware I have done any such thing. IAC there is a simple solution. I will just shut up completely to and about Marcia and then there won't be anything to object to. See if she does the same.