>>Well, in the Netherlands people are forced only to participate in the BASIC insurance. All kinds of extra care is optional. How about such a system?
>
>I'm fundamentally opposed to the concept of mandating that an individual purchase health insurance.
>
>In addition, I think it's a little soon to judge the system. As I understand, the Dutch system was last reformed in 2006 the same year that Commonwealth Care was adopted in Massachusetts. I do not feel there has been enough time to accurately asses the systems. Both are showing cracks and it's a matter of can they be fixed or is there a fundamental flaw in the concept? I honestly do not know. If, in time, the system demonstrates an ability to bring in free market principals while providing acceptable care at an affordable price, I imagine it will take off like wildfire, regardless of my opinion. For me, empowering the citizenry is the best way to achieve success.
Why must everything be 'free market'. Because it contains the word 'free'? Are you free to choose your own body and brains? Perhaps you'd like to be, but nature has decided differently. Now tell me, do you disagree here with nature, that you're opposed to the concept of mandating an individual that it is forced to live with the body and brains that nature chose?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
