An interesting thing was brought up to me in regards to the value of UT. During our interviews of candidates for a position, I was surprised on the number of applicants that indicated that they did not subscribe nor use UT. When asked why (since I have always valued the information it gives) the common reply was there was way too much trivial stuff being presented that it became a waste of time and not that much value.
After thinking about it, i can see where there is getting to be too much "clutter" responses in what sometimes is a valid thread. Looking back, i see political opinions surfacing, book or movie discussion etc. that have no bearing to the original thread.
I would be interested in what others think. I know the solution is not simple, only common sense from the contributers of this clutter to be a better member. Maybe just restricting a reponse to any one thread from any one member would be an answer. If there needs to be more responses, then start a new thread to extend it. Hopefully the new thread would stick to the original topic. I woul think that after 2 or 3 responses, if there is still an interest, that a new thread would certainly benefit all.
Only my 2cents worth. I hate to see the value of the UT go down the tubes because of a handful of members getting carried away on personal issues outside of the initial threads purpose.
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only