>>>>>>>>Does this mean we can finally put to rest the old canard "torture does not work."?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/08/did_they_work.asp
>>>>>>>>http://oceanaris.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/obama-vs-cheney-round-two/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's still something civilized nations all agreed not to do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That was not the question.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, but it is the point. We had no business doing some of the stuff we did the past several years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Sure we did, it allowed you to sleep peacefully at night without bombs blowing up in your neighborhood.
>>>
>>>I'm not sure I believe that. What I do believe is it was extremely arrogant to turn our backs on international agreements against torture (whoops, sorry, enhanced interrogation techniques) that had been in place for decades. No wonder we are hated. We think the rules don't have to apply to us.
>>
>>Do people 'hating us' prioritize these rules? Please, take my question in correct perspective: are you sure that their hatred caused by our (perceived by you) non-compliance with rules (that they likely despise) or by something else?
>
>The torturing certainly did not enhance our reputation anywhere. In general I think it's more the arrogance that ticks people off. To me it is unseemly for a rich and powerful nation to revel in the role of Goliath.

Should I understand that by tacitly accepting my question you agreed with the idea?
Arrogance is elastic term. For some/many people it is identical with existence; i.e. if someone/something is rich/powerful that it is already arrogant, no matter what.