I just pointed to the hole in your reasoning. It does not mean that I accepted your definition of torture.
>Then it means that you give them the power to torture any one they want. They could torture you only on the basis that they
think you represent a threat.
>
>>AFAIK, interrogation comes before trial, i.e. if some terrorists already judged and found guilty that it implies that some interrogation already had place.
Edward Pikman
Independent Consultant