>>I don't approve the use of a filter. I'm an adult and I don't need someone to filter out what I want and don't want to read.
>
>I agree with you, however, it is not my site.
>
>>Instead of a complete ban, why not only remove the priviledge to reply and contact you? The twitt filter is another option you could use.
>
>Just to be clear. I did not contact anyone, nor call for his banning. I have a very thick skin and do not find it necessary to employ the twit filter.
>
>Besides, I rather enjoy ad hominem personal attacks in response to my arguments as it signals that the other side is vacant of a rational point of disagreement and must engage in a linguistic assault in order to satisfy some emotional void they've experienced due to my presentation.

Well, jeeeez. Here I've been trying to be decent in my responses to you, and now I find out you enjoy personal attacks. Does this mean I have to change my approach? ;)

>
>>>I doubt he was banned for the insult alone, more likely the combination of the personal attack and dodging of the filter.