>>>I don't approve the use of a filter. I'm an adult and I don't need someone to filter out what I want and don't want to read.
>>
>>I agree with you, however, it is not my site.
>>
>>>Instead of a complete ban, why not only remove the priviledge to reply and contact you? The twitt filter is another option you could use.
>>
>>Just to be clear. I did not contact anyone, nor call for his banning. I have a very thick skin and do not find it necessary to employ the twit filter.
>>
>>Besides, I rather enjoy ad hominem personal attacks in response to my arguments as it signals that the other side is vacant of a rational point of disagreement and must engage in a linguistic assault in order to satisfy some emotional void they've experienced due to my presentation.
>
>Well, jeeeez. Here I've been trying to be decent in my responses to you, and now I find out you enjoy personal attacks. Does this mean I have to change my approach? ;)

ROFL.

That depends...are you trying to give me pleasure? ;)

>>
>>>>I doubt he was banned for the insult alone, more likely the combination of the personal attack and dodging of the filter.