>>>>>>LOL.. Yeah
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Dmitry, I can understand the brain overload. I wouldn't worry about WCF right now. Get an understanding of WPF and MVVM pattern then move onto other things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I decided to stick with WinForms for now.
>>>>
>>>>I wouldn't. Take the challenge
>>>
>>>Thank you for your suggestion.
>>
>>If you later decide to research WPF and MVVM further, I found these:
>>
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dd419663.aspx
>>http://karlshifflett.wordpress.com/mvvm/
>
>Tracy,
>
>Thank you very much for the links. Funny, just before I logged into UT, I emailed a quote to a customer for converting a VFP application to SQL Server. I didn't specify what UI will be used <g>. And I doubt that they will ask. My goal is to try to convert the app to WinForms and SQL Server. This customer, I believe, is mainly concerned with preserving the look and feel. So WinForms is the closest to VFP. And I decided that I simply don't have the time and skills to take up a WPF project; I am already working almost 24/7 with chest pains <g>.
>
>So I thank you for your links but I will be learning and doing my first job (of course, if they approve) in WinForms.

Good luck!