>>>That separation is your arbitrary one Peter I don't see it, prostitution is a part of the sex industry.
>>
>>Arbitrary? Nonsense. Why do you not want to answer my question(s)? Are you afraid that you'll gonna loose this discussion? That you'll have to admit that there is a certain legitimate ground for prostitution? That it's not in all situations a bad thing? Your moves are tactical rather than argumental.
>
>Happy to answer your questions Peter. And you seperation is arbitrary. You've just done it for your own convenience so you can take a very extreme example and use it to justify prostitution. There is no justification. If you can't find a partner for whatever reason get over it. Nobody ever died from not having sex.

From your answer I draw the conclusion that you oppose any type of prostitution, even what you call the extreme case of a handicapped person who seeks sexual relief. That's a fundamental position. I guess it's your right to take that stance, but not many (here at least) will agree with you and if you'd be the dictator, you'd cause a lot of frustration in certain groups of men. You'd say to those men: Get over it, you won't die of not having sex. You say that far too easy. I also suspect that not-having-any-sex is not one of your own problems. Who are you to decide for other persons what they must endure in this? Isn't the desire for having sex a fundamental drive?! How about the amount of rape? Don't you think it would increase if there were no prostitutes?