>>>
http://www.who.int/csr/don/2009_09_18/en/index.html>>
>>But, OTOH,
http://www.republicoflakotah.com/2009/the-mask-slips-for-those-with-eyes-to-see-preparing-for-the-real-pandemic/>
>Tamiflu is a vaccine? They are using it regularly as a vaccine? That's news to me. As far as I knew, Tamiflu was only given during the first couple of days when a person actually contracts the flu as a flu treatment. I thought it was only used for prevention for extremely dangerous flu strains that were already present in people the person comes into contact with and the person given Tamiflu has unusual risk factors (where the Tamiflu risk was less than the risk of dying from the flu). Tamiflu has always had risks associated with it, so that is why I thought it was limited in its use. BTW, I was tested positive a couple of years ago for the actual flu strain and the doctor prescribed Tamiflu. It promptly went into the cupboard until it expired and I then threw it out.
As a consolation, it was supposed to be good for five years, but now they've improved it and the old stock is now good for seven years :). Or such is the executive order from Serbian Ministry of Health.
Maybe the mention of it in the article is exactly the bit of confusion which will serve as an excuse for the whole story to be discarded without bothering about the facts.
>What the heck is this?
>
>
Knowing this history, it’s not surprising when Indians on isolated Canadian reserves start sickening and dying en masse from sudden illnesses, after receiving flu shots. After all, it’s still the law in Canada, under the apartheid Indian Act, that no on-reserve Indian can refuse medical treatments or experimentation. So it’s small wonder that these reserves are the places being targeted first to be injected with untested, unsafe and potentially lethal flu vaccinesI know a Canadian bigwig has apologized to the First Nation recently (a year or two ago) for the treatment in the past... but that doesn't change the current treatment, I guess. Well, we have plenty Canadians here who would know more.
