>
>I also go way back when it comes to naming fields for properties ... I prefer to use the "m_" convention. So, your example would look like this for me:
>
>

>public string SomeProperty
>{
>   //////
>}
>private string m_SomeProperty;
>

>
>I also dislike the variation of this that seems to be quite popular and that is just using the underscore, so it becomes:
>
>

>public string SomeProperty
>{
>   //////
>}
>private string _SomeProperty;
>

>
>I dunno ... it just seems harder to read. But maybe that's just me.
>

Not just you. I use the m_ prefix and I'm not much of a fan of just an underscore prefix. In C/C++ it seemed to become a war, first _something then __something, then ___something and, depending on the font, it is nearly impossible to tell how many underscores there are.