>>No, don't do it! Don't mention Hungarian Notation. Another royally bad idea!
>
>Don't do what? I agree that Hungarian notation is a bad idea but where have you been when I was defending the idea that it was bad:)
>
>What I meant don't you use Camel/Pascal casing in VFP too., be it Hungarian or not. At least I do it.
>
>Cetin

Hey, I think I may have chimed in on at least one of those threads to support you. <g> That's probably one of those good ideas I seem to remember you having around here. <g>

My methods/variables would be like this:

TotalCount (a variable)
AcctNum (a variable)

No m. -- I dropped that a long time ago.

CalcSqYds (a method)

Sometimes my method names will get quite long:

AdjustSampleRcptNotification, SetTestCodeMultiSampleStatus, probably I have some longer ones. Maybe we should have a contest for the longest method name. I might be in the top five. <g>

However, with field names I have been inconsistent. Sometimes I might write it as Cust_Name and other times cust_name. But this is a minor thing to me. I strive for more consistency with that these days, but as far as good code goes, I think that is very low on the list of issues, if it's there at all. There are many, many more imporant things on the list above this issue that make for good code (or not).