>
>You can't deny the fact that dog, DOG, Dog, and DoG still give you the idea of a dog.
Yes you can recognize it as a dog eventually but it requires extra effort. Why is it a good thing in programming language?
>This is the way our brains developed over millenia.
I guess you're expert in human brain so I wouldn't argue with you here.
>It is much better to create a clearer naming convention to address such issues.
And how case-sensitive languages impede that? I believe all of them have such conventions.
> I'm sorry that so many people in our industry want to make code more cryptic.
What it has to do with case-sensitive languages? I've seen FoxPro programs achieve that.
> I like Donald Knuth's idea of literate programming.
How case-sensitive languages do not fit in it from your POV ?
--sb--