>>CamelCase, as defined in a Wikipedia entry, is not with a leading lower case letter. But, there are probably differing understandings of what that means, so let's not split hairs. The point is that I know what you're referring to. It has been fairly popular in C dialects, I believe (lowercase first letter).
>>
>>As for "probably 95% of NET code follows the general convention" I would doubt that seriously. There is tons and tons of .NET code out there and I'd be surprised if it was anywhere near the figure you quote. You made the statement, so don't ask me to disprove it. You prove it and show me some evidence instead of pulling it out of thin air.
>
>How do you propose I should prove that? But, on your behalf, I trawled the web looking for examples of C# code that *didn't* follow the convention and failed to find any. And I haven't got a C# book that doesn't follow it either.

I just found a 95% adherance rate to be pretty high in an industry that has not been good at following standards.