>Did I miss another article on this? According to what I read, he was caught planning terrorist acts or planning on aiding the act of terrorism but no one was at risk or died. Should be treated similar to those who are caught aranging to pay someone to kill someone else (but the hit never goes through or the person paid was fbi, police, or law enforcement of some other type) or conspiracy to commit murder, etc...

To me this falls more into an act of war category, except the combatant is not wearing a uniform.

>
>
>
>
>>Thanks...as I said, I'm reconsidering my stance on the entire situation.
>>
>>If there is zero question....if the man his truly guilty, I have zero issue with execution. Those who take life in the first degree, cannot claim protection of their own life.
>>
>>But there are now more and more questions about convicting men who are not guilty. Even with all the advanced investigation techniques....juries (and judges) are comprised of human beings - who are not infallible and can make mistakes.