Banged up is sent to prison.

>I don't understand what you mean by 'banged up'.
>
>If I went out & shot someone and killed them, I'd expect to be put to death.
>
>
>
>>So if through a series of unfortunate events you where banged up and sentenced you'd be good to go.
>>
>>>I don't think that's it at all. I think the judge who sentences a criminal to die, and the excutioner are more concerned with justice for the victim than for the criminal's rights. When a person take's another person's life in a crime, they forfeight their rights, including the right to live.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm going to have to disagree with that. Obviously the ones doing the "executing" and the ones who ok the "executing" could care less about the one they're killing either. And again - for a huge number of other reasons it makes no sense.
>>>>
>>>>>It makes perfect sense. The difference is night and day.
>>>>>
>>>>>'Killing' is different than 'Executing'. Killing is done by someone who could care less about their victim. They are selfish and often not
>>>>>much more than animals preying on others,.
>>>>>
>>>>>Execution is the administration of justice.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I still think it's bizarre that anyone who thinks killing is wrong would think that its ok to kill someone for killing. Doesn't really make much sense, doesn't deter the crime as statistics prove, costs too much money, and is very inhuman. What possible advantage is there?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks...as I said, I'm reconsidering my stance on the entire situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If there is zero question....if the man his truly guilty, I have zero issue with execution. Those who take life in the first degree, cannot claim protection of their own life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But there are now more and more questions about convicting men who are not guilty. Even with all the advanced investigation techniques....juries (and judges) are comprised of human beings - who are not infallible and can make mistakes.