Isolation.

>So what do you do when the violent criminal is sent to prison, then kill other inmates? Happens all the time. Putting these kind of people in prison on moves the problem somewhere else.
>
>
>>Where we do not agree is what we consider the capital punishement for the criminal. You say that killing... oups... execution is the capital punishement. I say that it's life sentence with no chance of liberation ever is the capital punishement. If I were a criminal and I was given the choice between execution and life sentence, I would choose execution. Clean, fast and mostly pain free.
>>
>>>The reason you see it as a paradox is because you and others who beleive the way you do see exeuction as killing when it's not. It's administration of justice. It's simply giving someone a level of punishment above all others. In most cases, the punishmet fits the crime, and to do less is in insult to the victims and their families.
>>>
>>>Consider this: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33410779/ns/today-today_people/
>>>
>>>Would you lock this person up? I bet you this person was a known sex offender, meaning he had probably already spent time in prison, and has decided not to change. This kind of thing is commonplace - where a criminal has been to jail one or mroe times for committing a crime, and did it again, this time killing someone. There needs to be a punishment for these type of people that is beyond a mere jail sentence.