>He didn't. What I'm telling you is the way Microsoft envisions WPF design to be done.

Well if that's the case why did MS put an "XAML editor" in the VS IDE? Oh wait. Let's see. We'll give em a free, crappy editor that they'll find powerless to create those nice UIs/UXs. They'll quickly give up then we can make em fork over some more dough to buy a real XAML editor.

>
>>Where does Bernard say that he's using Expression Blend? Did I miss that in his post. I assumed that he was referring to the VS IDE.
>>
>
>Since when does "VIsual" mean Wysiwyg?

I would hope that a "Visual" UI editor would produce WYSIWYG. Imagine if today's version of Word didn't print what I edited and saw on my screen.

>
>
>>How can you say it doesn't work when Bernard seems to have proven that it does not! I, like Nicholas, also find that amusing. Gotta love the "Visual" in VS.
>>