>yes it was a flop. its been discontinued.

What, before the series was finished or before they got to the end of the solar system?

>
>its amazingly bad.
>
>the zero g premise is that they have something in their socks that sticks them to the deck. though in one scene one actor is chucking a ball up and down.

And this sticky sock stuff keeps the women's hair hanging "down" too? And when they run too? And wouldn't one just want to have a little zero-G play? i know I would. So what are the rotating arms all about?

And I missed what this similar DNA business is all about. How can that be?

>
>I loved the idea that someone who punched a reporter and then the head of the space agency was the ideal man to be in space with for 6 years.
>
>Any news on the job?

I think you have the answer to that already.

>
>>Wassup with this series? Was it a flop in the USA or what? I've dipped in and out of a few episodes and can't make head or tail of it. One minute they're on the ship, next they're back on earth pre-flight. Hard to keep up with what's when and who's where.
>>
>>And as for Zero-G - the only time they are weightless is when they go EVA, which is rare as hen's teeth. And THEN they stand in the airlock. They're always standing around - not weightless. Now the ship exhibits rotating arms which, I'd assumed, would be the living quarters, providing false G via centrifugal force. Yet these are seen through windows from a static position.
>>
>>then they're having real-time instantaneous confabs with mission control, even though they're millions of miles from earth. One expects a second or two delay just speaking on the phone across teh Atlantic!
>>
>>Being a life-long SF fan I was hoping for great things but nowt seems to happen but bickering and mooning over their relationships. Getting a bit bored of it now - only after 3 episodes.