>>>>>And the destruction of the family as we knew it is also often due to forced relocation. If one of a pair gets a chance to get promoted (or to keep the job) by moving to another city, most of the time there wasn't a job for the spouse, or not one that would mean a smart career move. Some of it was probably make work. And sometimes the value of second income was doubtful, because the cost of child care would eat a sizable chunk of it.
>>>>>
>>>>>So it's as much the women's fault as Milo[s caron]evi[c acute]'s staying in power was my fault.
>>>>
>>>>I dunno about above, and I am sure it is not yours;
>>>>but Milosevic staying in power for so long IS to some extent womens fault ! {g}
>>>>
>>>>Back in early 90ies, quiet big %age of our soap opera audiences were either madly inlove, or otherwise mesmerised with
>>>>the b****rd !!. If he was not a politician - he would have been fantastic for the role of Carrington in 'Dynasty' ! {lol}
>>>
>>>A little bit of charisma goes a long way in elections - that happens in all countries it seems...
>>
>>Former chancleor Kohl and recent Merkel are perfect examples that one not need any charisma. (At least here.) Maybe not a bad choice. The last charismatic one was definitely worst.
>
>If that were true, how could one explain GWB being elected? :)

It was after Clinton and the perjury (notice I wrote perjury and not affair) and dotcom fiasco. A change of party in the top office typically occurs after a term where negative military or economic situations happen. Hence the change of party again after GWB.