First of all, I was not drinking. Maybe you meant some other time.

Second -- no, there is no second. Being argumentative is one of the bad habits I am trying to leave behind. Not always successfully, as you can see. Have a good evening.

>>"To assist you" -- how arrogant. I am with Sylvain on this one.
>>
>>Capitalization does not advance your argument, BTW.
>
>
>What exactly do you think my argument is? (I find it amazing that you of all people would call me arrogant) Do you ever go back and read your messages you post when drinking? I have provided links for you in the past. I won't do it now. Do your own search. Arrogrance was the last thing I was trying to project. I was simply trying to put focus on the difference because I really am amazed he could not see it. I find it amazing that you do not see the difference between what terrorists are doing and capital punishment after a jury conviction in a court of law. When was the last time you went out and pronounced yourself judge and jury to the innocent and chopped off someone's head on video? I don't see you placing explosive devices in your street to blow up everyone including women and children. Do you really not see the difference?
>
>I am not a proponent of capital punishment, but the difference is night and day.
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>I am AMAZED that you do not recognize a difference! I disagree with him and I see the difference. I emphasized it below to assist you.
>>>
>>>>Not that different. Both of them want to kill their respective "criminals" and both of them want the execution to be seen by a maximum of peoples. The only difference is the level of justice, but William seem to want a reduction of the level of justice in the US so that it cost less.
>>>>
>>>>>Really? While I disagree with his views, there is a HUGE difference. He is referring to capital punishment after a guilty verdict in a court of law and administered by the judicial system. He is not talking about kidnapping innocent people and chopping their heads off on video.