>>>hmmm...so you have to have a prescription to get it, but they want to tax it because it's not a prescription drug. Interesting...talk about having your cake and eating it too...geeze.
>>
>>Nope, it's a catch-22.
>>
>>This cake business I actually never understood. If you can't have your cake and eat it too, what does it mean when you're offered to "have a cake"? Own it for a while, but you can't eat it?
>
>You just have a piece of cake and enjoy it, silly.

Silly and visually... but can't eat it if you have it. Or is it that you can eat it, but can not "eat too" (whatever "eat too" may mean)? Or is it that you can only eat (or eat too) a cake that you don't have?

>That was not said with any hostility. You have always been one of my favorites here.

"Silly" is about the mildest possible word - and you still aren't sure whether I may be offended? If that's how the world looks like once you've been through the deep end, I sure don't ever want to go that way, brrrr... What's next, "in the case this sentence contains any words and/or punctuation, my apologies - it was not my intention"?