>> Or do you blame the U.S. entirely for those failures? (The U.S. does share some of the blame for exascerbating the situation)
>
>Here's a view from someone whom I don't know anything about: http://de-construct.net/?p=7411
>
>My wife found that while looking for something else. The facts are right; the interpretation may be biased but only little.

Interesting. So inside the same country of Serbia, the Albanians:

have their own TV, radio programs and channels in Albanian, their own newspapers in Albanian language, tuition-fee free primary, secondary schools and even university in Albanian language with textbooks imported from Albania, free dental and medical care, abundant welfare,

and the Serbs do not? The article is confusing as to which country it is referring to: Serbia, Albania, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro and Hungary? Or is the issue mostly of Serbs in Albania and other countries?

If so, then there should be more public media attention to that. Also, Nato is not only the U.S. and some of those issues are handled by the U.N. not Nato. According to the article, Albanians were given protection and rights, but no guarantee of the same has been for Serbs? Do the Serbs have those same rights (other than the issue of the surname in Albania) but are not guaranteed?

It would be interesting to read the transcripts from the Nato and UN sessions.