They are very small records. So 20 thousand records in
a database running in a very powerfull machine that's
not a problem these days.
All operations I've done in the database are returned in
some miliseconds.
But, anyway, I will do some tests to check performance.
Thanks!


>>Thanks Naomi!
>>By now it's just about 20 thousands records. Very few.
>
>::)))
>
>If it's 20 thousands, then indeed use count(*) rather than select 1
>
>
>Though, perhaps, I need to run a quick test myself, even if I'm positive what will get better speed.