Hi Steve,

A thought just occurred to me, depending on how your app is architected. Is your DataAccess on a server machine? IOW, does your UI go through web services or remoting to access your database? If so, then you'd probably only need to upgrade the server-side pieces (or maybe even just the DataAccess projects), thereby reducing the number of computers that would need to have .NET 1.1 on them.

You'd need to obviously convert the whole app to VS2003, 1.1 but perhaps only need to distribute the DataAccess DLLs, assuming you've architected your app with a separate DAL.

Just a thought ...

~~Bonnie





>Hi Bonnie,
>
>I agree with regards 1.0 being buggy. Most of our development is now VS 2005 or 2008 but it is one of our older apps we havent upgraded, mainly due to the fact it is used by quite a few users with a lot of them connecting remotely and we didnt want issues with any of these machines not having framework 1.1. I dont suppose this should be much of a problem any more though so I guess we will upgrade this app.
>
>Thanks for your response
>Steve