>Does anyone believe that the Foxpro Foundation Class libraries will be the new standard? It seems to have so many holes and inconsistencies in it, like not using views, looking up by Record Number!?!
>
>The childish part of me also takes offense to the fact that C++ programmers use the *Microsoft* Foundation Class, while we use *Foxpro* Foundation Class as though Microsoft is once again distancing itself from Fox.

Jim,

I don't think the FFC will become a "standard" outside of the fact that it does exactly what it is designed to do, make it easier for new users to get into VFP.

We will still have our own classes for our own purposes, but the FFC classes may be helpful in places.