Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Noupdate Clause
Message
From
26/12/2009 17:59:46
Dragan Nedeljkovich (Online)
Now officially retired
Zrenjanin, Serbia
 
 
To
26/12/2009 14:51:39
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Title:
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP2
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01440702
Message ID:
01440713
Views:
81
This message has been marked as a message which has helped to the initial question of the thread.
>Would using files with the USE ... NOUPDATE clause make access to those files faster in a multi-user network environment?

It did once, back in the time of XT and 286 machines, and generally should work today as well, because it eliminates locking. Those who don't write to a file, don't require locks, and the network has that much less overhead. I don't know how much, though, as a lock is just a few packets travelling between a WS and the file server (request, response) and the server checking somewhere in the file's map whether the lock can be granted or not, and writing an entry when a lock is put (and erasing it when unlocking), plus some signalization about dirty old buffers. But in a tight spot this may help some. YMMV, I guess.

back to same old

the first online autobiography, unfinished by design
What, me reckless? I'm full of recks!
Balkans, eh? Count them.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform