>First of all, I am totally against the CIA operating the way they do, without any jurisdiction over them either. This is completely wrong. I do not accept that we should have secret prisons overseas, period. It is John F, Kennedy who swore to tear the CIA apart for its many crimes. You can see what happened to him. I believe that his loss of life was a coup by right-wing people in our government. I do not believe that Oswald was the shooter, in other words. The CIA is out of control. Bush 1 was involved with the CIA for some time, more so than we might think. I never trusted him either.
>
>There are also non-military connected soldiers operating in these wars in the middle east. I consider this to be very bad practice, because they are not held accountable as military people are.
>
>I do not recognize international courts in regard to our soldiers who are sent into hostile areas to fight. If they are acting in good consciuence and only doing their duty, I have no problem with them not being brought to trial in international courts, when they are following standard orders. But, if they are murdering innocents, I feel that our own military people should be tried by our military; I do see a problem though in that the fox is guarding the hen house. But, you won't get very many people to go to war if they think they will be brought into international courts for giving a terrorist a bloody lip.


There are people here that are suspect of internet crimes or drug crimes, which never have been in the US, that are brought to trail in the US. There are numerous examples of that.

What obama is saying is that interpoll, should be able to do the same in the US.

To me its the same.





>>How is this different than lets say the CIA operating in europe in secret prisons together with was practised there?
>
>>How is this different than not recognising the internation court in The Hague for wars of crime, to avoid american soldiers to be brought to trail for war crimes?