>>>Aren't there some issues with doing this?
>>>
>>>It would be cool to have the option to work on my classes as a VCX or PRG depending on what I wanted to do. But I thought there was some issue about whether you could make a round trip liek this.
>>
>>Non-visual classes you have to design in a prg.
>
>You mean if it is based on Custom?
>
>I have several classes in a VCX that are based on Custom. So you're saying a Textbox class could round-trip, but not a class based on Custom?
>
>What if the VCX had one TextBox and one Custom. What would happend if I tried to round-trip that?
>
>.

No, I meant class based on session. It can only be defined in a prg. I forgot other non visual classes. As I trick I used I started to create my business object class (subclass of session based) as a custom based class in a VCX first.

You can define custom based class in VCX or in PRG and switch between the two with no problems using the utilities Prg2VCX and VCX2Prg.