>>And that's from a single day's sample, as unscientific as it gets. Here's a person of distinction, if I haven't posted this already: lord Monckton:
>>http://clareswinney.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/monckton-on-climategage-the-evidence-that-shows-global-warming-is-a-fraud/
>
>I looked at the SPPI website - which is pretty much Monckton's baby.
>From the 'mission statement' : "SPPI is a nonprofit institute of research and education dedicated to sound public policy based on sound science."
>So I looked at the 'Papers' link expecting some peer-reviewed research as per the above. Zilch. If this is the type of thing that gets listed as scientific then the organisation gets no credence from me: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/climategate_analysis.pdf

I don't see how you expect the hanging out of CRU's dirty laundry to be science. It's just dirty laundry.