>>>>I started a class as a prg and would like to include it on a classlib. I think that problem has been solved here before, but can't find the solution in UT.
>>>>
>>>>Any help would be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>TIA,
>>>>
>>>>Alex
>>>
>>>Look for PrgToVcx utility. http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~PrgToVcx
>>
>>So what's the deal with going from VCX to PRG and back to VCX?
>>
>>Aren't there some issues with doing this?
>>
>>It would be cool to have the option to work on my classes as a VCX or PRG depending on what I wanted to do. But I thought there was some issue about whether you could make a round trip liek this.
>
>There isn't something for VCX to Prg + not all controls work right when it is in PRG. Also you cannot subclass non-visual classes in a VCX.
>IMHO it is unnecessary (or unreliable with the known tools to say it precisely) to do VCX to PRG and PRG to VCX. I prefer a mixture of them (VCX for visuals and Prg for non-visuals + custom).
>Cetin

With the powerful features of PEM Editor (filtering by property/method name, sorting, viewing parent code, etc.) I find that my productivity of working on even Non-Visual classes is much faster when working in a VCX.

So, I cannot adopt your preference for keeping Custom classes in a PRG. I am too spolied with PEM Editor. However, I will admit that there *are* times that I wish I could temporarily work on the VCX in a PRG, just for a few certain tasks, and then come right back to the VCX.

Maybe one day!
.