>>>So I looked at the 'Papers' link expecting some peer-reviewed research as per the above. Zilch. If this is the type of thing that gets listed as scientific then the organisation gets no credence from me: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/climategate_analysis.pdf
>>
>>I don't see how you expect the hanging out of CRU's dirty laundry to be science. It's just dirty laundry.
>
>I wasn't calling it science - I was only querying why the web-site would list it as a scientific paper (not that I found anything else that would fall into that category)

I guess they should have created a separate category - metascientific :). After all, it's all about scientists.