>>>>>>>>It's unconstitutional to execute someone who's insane.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Where does it say that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In 1986 the US Supreme Court held that the execution of insane people was barred by the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What difference does being insane make re: the Eigth Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>>Not that I really care. Justice doesn't go hand in hand with the Supremes. Drop them off here and justice will be done.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>As Justice Thurgood Marshall put it.... the Constitution protects "the dignity of society ... from the barbarity of mindless vengeance,"
>>>>Thus an execution can only be carried on on those who can understand why the state is killing them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>"the Constitution protects "the dignity of society ... from the barbarity of mindless vengeance,"
>>>
>>>My dogs will recycle the parts. Society would be protected from the barbarity of their mindless vengeance
>>
>>Interesting that you think feeing a human to dogs would actually somehow benefit humanity by shielding us from barbarity. Surely you understand just how ridiculous that is.
>
>I didn't say anything about feeding a human to dogs. I'm talking about the creatures that killed the mother and tried to kill the girl. They do not count as anything except a threat to society to me.

hmmmm...well sicko or not - you're still talking about a person. Plus it would be kind of nice to have a trial or guilty plea prior to rushing to judgement here.

>>>>>>>>>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,581997,00.html?test=latestnews
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Or the body parts, anyway.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Or we can let Tamar rehabilitate them.