>Jim,
>
>Thanks for catching that mistake. It just goes to show that I never call functions/procedures using DO ... WITH ... I always use function call syntax.
>
>>One minor correction, using the @ in a DO ... WITH line will cause a syntax error. Parms are passed by reference by default with DO ... WITH ...

This reminds me of an old, mostly theoretical problem: there is a Do < prgname > in < procfilename > syntax. What's the equivalent function call, short of doing a Set Procedure To ... before the call?