>>>>>It reads, "I've no clue what logical expressions are".
>>>>>"IF THIS VALUE IS FALSE" would be
>>>>>

>>>>>IF NOT THIS.VALUE
>>>>>

>>>>>>Example:

IF THIS.VALUE = .F.

reads as IF THIS VALUE IS FALSE.
>>>>
>>>>I've seen this every place I've worked on code. It drives me nuts, but I've actually had other developers change my IF !this.value to IF this.value = .F. so I've learned to live with it :o) I don't sweat the small stuff.
>>>
>>>And I won't use ! for NOT. I find it's too hard to see. I always spell out NOT>
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>I must be weird then; Always loved simplicity ;
>>
>>

>>If !ok
>>  return   && .t. 
>>

>
>My problem with that code is that I have to look too hard to see whether it's IF !ok or IF lok.
>
>Tamar

Hmmm. When I see NOT in place of !, I tend to wonder if the writer is lacking a deeper understanding of the aspects of the programming language. No need to spell out NOT when ! will work just fine.

:o) Just couldn't resist. I'm ok with:

IF ! LLOkay

IF NOT LLOkay

IF LLOkay = .F.

IF LLOKay = .T.

IF LLOkay

All work. To me, which format is used is more user preference than anything else. I prefer ! LLOkay, but over the years I've had to decipher code written in all formats. I've had folks change my choice which is a pet peeve when it does nothing to the behavior, but hey, that's life :o)