>>So, is it the consenus then that it is a bad/dangerous thing to name my Primary index "PRIMARY"?
>
>This is an interesting discussion. I think we've all been in that situation once.
>
>More than that, we also have to think ahead. Which means, a word used in code, index definition, etc., might be available to use now but may become a reserved word for upcoming versions.

While your comments imply I shouldn't use the word Primary as an index name, nobody has actually said so...
The reason I ask is because the person who trained me says he does/did it all the time.