>>>>>It looks like some small part of that is going to happen, starting with new rules (actually old rules reenacted) preventing them from over-leveraging themselves. Of course they are fighting it tooth and nail but there are serious efforts afoot to decouple traditional banking from investment operations. AIG never would have been in the soup if not for a wacko group in London playing around with exotic investments.
>>>>
>>>>Have you lost your mind? Putting the blame or even a portion of it outside the U.S.????? :o)
>>>
>>>Well, the Fed is partly British banks, isn't it?
>>
>>Well, at least they haven't claimed neutrality while financing a regime that exterminated millions of people, hidden the money (including 280 trucks of solid gold after melting it and the world knows where that came from) and then tried to steal the money from the family members of those killed as well... at least not yet anyway...
>
>That is outrageous claim thrown against our belowed bank(st)ers !
>WW2 had nothing to do with money! It was all about patriotisam and deliberating world from evils of fashism.
>It had nothing to do with 1929 stock market crush nor depression thereafer. Loss of gold bars was purely coincidental
>collateral damage that happened in the eye of war huricane. (Probably gold flew away like those cows that fly somethime durring tornadoe season... {g} )
>
>WW3 (when it happens) will not have anything to do with stock bubbles / bank(st)ers eighter. It is just that circumstances will be quiet simmilar like with ww2. But no pattern, not so ever. {g}

You're joking, right??? Pretty sure you are from the {g}... :o)