OK. The place I was working in Baton Rouge was a pretty serious SQL Server shop and their DBAs specifically forbade sp_ prefixes. And they were potentates -- nothing went into production without their approval.
I know some folks here are not working at the moment. Anyone who happens to be in that predicament is encouraged to talk to Amedisys. The last I heard they only had funding for contractors through the end of last year. I don't know if that has changed. They had a bunch of us last year. Their line of work is home health care and hospice care, and business is booming. Baton Rouge is a great place and the people are terrific. Of all the places I have worked they are one of the two who approach software development most rigorously. I think Amedisys may have gained an incorrect bad reputation here due to one prominent UT member who was turned down. Their hiring process is rigorous and being a team player is crucial. If you are interested, contact Nicolle Psilos of TEKSystems in New Orleans.
>I think it originally did, but many people started using sp_ against recommendations, so they started to be called system procedures.
>
>>I have always understood the sp_ to stand for stored procedure.
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement