>Dragan,
>
>That's something else I never use, huge procedure files. I just grew to dislike them in FPW2.x. I've decided it's better to put each function in their own .prg. Even though we now have SET PROC ADDITIVE the only time I use that is for my classes that can only be defined in .prg.
>
>>This reminds me of an old, mostly theoretical problem: there is a Do < prgname > in < procfilename > syntax. What's the equivalent function call, short of doing a Set Procedure To ... before the call?

Neither do I (didn't I say the problem was theoretical); my procedures are either within the file they're called from, or in separate files, or (in couple of special cases), in the caller .prg file. Anyway, if "do the_prg with param1, param2" is equal to the function call of "=The_prg(param1, param2)", what is equal to "do the_prg in prg_file with param1, param2"?

I think there's no answer to this, but... well, this itches my curiosity ever since 2.0 or so (when was the IN clause introduced, anyway?).