Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
More warrantless searches on the way...grrr
Message
General information
Forum:
News
Category:
Technology
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01449981
Message ID:
01452226
Views:
60
>>>>>>>>Sure I would. If I was working a case, I would pursue the target.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>OK, I believe you. Next question - you learn that a neighbor (who has cancer, or AIDS, or is in pain from some other health issue) is smoking pot. You either have evidence, and/or you actually see it. Would you arrest your neighbor?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Technically, yes. I would cite them in. Next scenario, I see my wife smoking a doobie....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"technically yes". Is that not quite the same as "yes" ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Technically, it is. We have a think called a misdemeanor citation, which instructs a person when to show up for booking, processing and to get their court date, sans incarceration. So, if you were to be "cited", you are technically under arrest, but you don't get to take the ride in the neat little police car, to the neat little jail.
>>>>
>>>>So let me get this right.
>>>>If your wife was suffering horribly from chemo and the only thing that made her feel better was pot - you'd write her a ticket?
>>>>Yer one sick puppy if that's true dude.
>>>
>>>I'd strip search her first . . . lol
>>
>>ya that's funny but I notice you're not answering the question - and my guess is because you realize you've talked yourself into a corner.
>>
>>You can't say you'd write your wife a ticket because that makes you a complete creep - but at the same time you think it'd be ok to write mine a ticket for the same damn thing - which means you've slipped from being a cop to being a pig because it's ok for your family but not mine. Perhaps you should re-examine your stance on this subject.
>
>You seem to me to have stepped over into personal abuse. I don't agree with John but he seems pretty clear he's going to apply the law as its stands now. Thats what I would want of a law enforcer. If you don't like a law get it changed, don't shoot the messenger.

Ok you're right.
It was a bad-taste comment that I made from being frustrated on our disagreement.
It's just one of those "put yourself in my shoes" type of thing and I'm not convinced he has...but at the same time I haven't either. That being said - I sure as hell would not want to be in his shoes and actually have to act on these things or have the whole would question my actions as those in law enforcement have too.
..
Anyway...John I owe you an apology ...I will keep our disagreements civil from now on. Lucky for me I've run across someone from the other side willing to discuss their views. We might not ever agree, but thankfully you've expressed your standpoint carefully and taken the time to explain your standpoint....I may not agree with all of it, but at least I know what you mean, and you haven't restored to taking personal digs at me in the meantime...which again I'd like to say I'm sorry and duuuh I know better. I've been a member of this fourm for a long time and in the past I've been troubled when I've seen personal attacks and honestly I know better.
Darn I wish I was allowed to have a doobie right now...hahahahaha
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform