>>>Regular as clockwork.
>>>
>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/02/white-house-land-grab/
>>
>>I'm a bit confused by this article. What does 'land grab' mean ?
>>In various places it says:
>>"increase their control over"
>>"seize"
>>"nab"
>>"limiting human activity"
>>"designating as monuments"
>>"locking up"
>>
>>What exactly is being proposed?
>
>Excellent question.
>
>Just so it's clear to all, the link is not a news story. It is an opinion piece by Jim DeMint, a far right Senator.

Tar and Feather :o)
Even the Fox story is honest enough, at its very end, to check with an Interior Department spokesperson, who says (contrary to Bishop): the memo "reflects some brainstorming discussions within [the Bureau of Land Management], but no decisions have been made about which areas, if any, might merit more serious review and consideration." Just to score cheap political points, Senators Bennett (R-UT) and Hatch (R-UT) and Representative Bishop have introduced a bill requiring Congressional consent before any national monuments are declared in Utah.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/2/23/839514/-Hike-On!-Tarring-Obama-for-a-federal-land-grab-that-wasnt