>Yes, it was real sloppy by the scientists who did it.
>
>Mike, if you think it was merely being sloppy, I think there's a great deal more you need to read. This was intellectual corruption. Care to hear some facts?
I am not disputing the facts of what happened there. Wanting a particular conclusion, of course, is the opposite of proper scientific method. That doesn't mean the conclusion is wrong.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
