>>>>"going in" "taking them out" "surgical strike" nice language that rarely is matched by reality. And the "if they don't like it, tough" should actually read "and if they don't like it we've stored up a whole load of problems for ourselves for the next 20 years"
>>>
>>>Not to mention that our military is already there and has been for years. Just one small example:
>>>
http://abcnews.go.com/International/us-military-die-pakistan-bombing/story?id=9734681>>
>>"More than 20 special operations forces are in Pakistan to train the Frontier Corps" - how many soldiers is "20 forces"? The military something surely has weird units of measure. Up to now, it was 1 troop (also an unknown number of people per one), now it's 1 force.
>
>The wording is that way for a reason. :o) You just demonstrated one reason for it. :o) Also, note that it specifically mentioned "Special Operations Forces." Not military forces, not civilian intelligence forces, not paid contract forces, not joint operation forces....
"never say what they mean
never mean what they say"
(Joe South, "Games people play")