Hello Scott,

iro Refox XI+, are you aware of a known, available hack against the latest version? i.e. yes, a hacker can hack anything given sufficient skill and motivation but is there an easily accesible automated hack?


>Reasons to change:
>1) Conditional support for Windows 7 with the older versions.
>2) Stay current with your tools.
>3) Help the Russians with your money.
>4) I working on a fourth reason.
>
>FWIW, I read on a hackers site that the "Ultra" version had already been cracked. At some point I'll be following up on this. I know older versions were hackable, albeit with some effort. In any event, everything is hackable so that's not a show stopper. Unsecured foxpro applications are incredibly easy to hack and refoxed versions aren't far behind. At least with Molebox (any version) the required skill level to hack increases by a magnitude, which makes the auditors happy.
>
>
>>Bonjour François,
>>
>>Is there a big difference between ordinary MoleBox and the Ultra version? Why should I get the Ultra one?
>>
>>
>>>>I had problems with their latest "Ultra" version and reported the problem. Recently they emailed that there was a new build 4.2408 (download at http://www.molebox.com/MoleBoxSetup.exe ). I haven't tried it yet but plan to in the next few days.
>>>
>>>Thank you for the useful feedback. Here using 4.2244 with deep satisfaction. Tried the 4.2321 a couple of months ago that failed and resorted to older stuff.
>>>
>>>It just made a rough test with this new 4.2408 build that you mentioned. It worked but no full test suite at this moment!
>>>
>>>PS: For readers of this forum, do not be fooled. The software is robust. Just that the testing process is a bit weak. You just have to cope :)