Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Naming convention for constraint
Message
 
General information
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Category:
Database management
Environment versions
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2005
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01454231
Message ID:
01454336
Views:
43
>>>>>In the book I use (SQL 2005 Unleashed) the author is using the following naming convention for UNIQUE constraint:
>>>>>AK_TABLENAME_FIELDNAME
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you think AK stands for Alternative Key? Or what else could it be?
>>>>>
>>>>>Also, how important and where do you use the names of constraints (other than when you create them)?
>>>>
>>>>If you need to drop a constraint, you need a name.
>>>
>>>I understand. But it is not used anywhere in my code, right? That is, if a constrained stops the update does the error message contain the constraint name? (if so, the user will see it and there it is important).
>>
>>As far as I remember, the constraint name is not shown in the error messages. Though, it is easy to test - just try inserting bad data.
>
>Bad data is my middle name; so I won't even have to try <g>.

Check this link http://metadata-standards.org/11179/#11179-5 for naming standards (each part is a separate downloadable file).
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.


My Blog
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform