>You've declared many times, not being a fan of bush, but I've never seen you support such ridiculous crap when it was directed at Bush when he was in office.

>Becuase Bush was largely attacked for all all the wrong reasons.

So what did stop you for posting your anger against Bush? Anyways, this is not what this is about.

>I cited two examples that, in microcosm, represent the quintessential fraud of the Obama administration (and noticed you haven't said a word...and I assure you, I have a 3-digit IQ) - including taking credit for any progress in Iraq, when Obama was opposed to everything that had brought us to the present.

I'm not aware of what you're trying to say here or even what you are refering to.

>As for Obama allegedly "not being an American", I've never used that argument. But there is little question that he is clueless to concept of life in America.
>The authenticity of the letter is really not the question here - the bigger issue is that the letter is, in many (not all, but many) instances, dead-on-balls accurate.

So if I were to say, "you're an idiot"... I don't have to give you a complete accurate reason for as why you are a complete idiot because I'm spot on?

Let me ask you the questions:
Do you regard the letter as political propoganda or not?
What do you think the intent of the letter is: A letter to obama, or propoganda to indoctinate people who are not able to see the intent of this?
Do you find there is any sufficient explanation for his claims?
Do you think that the letter shows that the author really knows what he is talking about?
Did you read the link I provided in my first answer?