>>I may be wrong about this (and I'm sure I'll be corrected if I am), but I >believe you can store the .JPG's in a GENERAL field of a table.
>
>I want to avoid making the table so large, taking up megs in hard drive. So, this option is not good for this, but thanks for the reply.
>
>Chuck

The images will take up the same amount of space whether they are in a table or stored as independant images. Perhaps a bit of overhead for the table, but at least you avoid the directory mess....