>>>
>>>>
>>>>How far do you go to feel sorry for the guy.
>>>>
>>>>Do you let him get stoned at work?
>>>>
>>>>Do you let him come in stoned?
>>>>
>>>>But..but...but he's in pain! we should let him be stoned at work. Why not? He can always sue Walmart if he injures himself, and anyone else he injures can sue Walmart too - hey - no problem!
>>>
>>>The article said he never went to work stoned.
>>
>>Luckily he always screened himself to verify that claim. What level of toxicity was he using for a limit?
>>
>>>It surprises me a bit that Wal-Mart has the right to regulate what he does at home.
>>
>>Just like any other company has the right to drug screen employees and potential employees. Just like the Federal gub-mint has that right.
>
>William, the stoners will use this at every opportunity for their own gain. They aren't really concerned about sick people getting medicine, they want to be a doobie brother!

You seem to not be willing to separate stoners from people with a medical need...and hey I think these 'stoners' are more concerned about sick people than you are because at least they're not trying to take away their meds.....

>On the other hand, if I had cancer, I wouldn't care what anyone else said (not that I do now)...

hahaha...yes true - don't care what doctors, medical professionals, legal experts, or economic experts say- hell don't really care what anyone says if its something to do with legalizing weed....although the first time you, a friend, or a family member needs it...then it's ok for you and them.

See this is what ticked me off so bad last time - "...if I had cancer, I wouldn't care what anyone else said..." - right - so here again you're saying that it's ok for YOU but screw everyone else? Talk about a double-standard....geeze John!